Laser Ranges use of Sensors vs (Mixed)Conventional equipped X-COM Soldier in 'Increment Arcs' stance between Midway Points
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Laser Ranges use of Sensors vs (Mixed)Conventional equipped X-COM Soldier in 'Increment Arcs' stance between Midway Points
The Conventional(mixed type) X-COM Soldier vs the theoretic use of Laser Weapon's maximum range stance described as 'Range'. The use stance of the displayed X-COM UFO Defense Soldier as it is oriented in increment arcs is in stance of larger moves between midway points, in comparison of Laser Ranges use of 'Sensor' sets to use the Tanks as embankment and depth of the other arguments between Tank/ Laser Cannon and Laser Rifle X-COM Soldier 6 unit range sets in midpoint Ranges.
(top down for continuity)
As ranks are broken in the initial use of movement the lack of overlapping ranging of individual X-COM Soldiers becomes much more incrementally important as time goes on in move sequence. This allows of use of more direct movements to catch this arc strategy by surprise, even in unmoving even-pairs or 1 unit attacks by the similarly ignorant computer opponent. The overlapping points in this (Mixed)Conventional X-COM Soldier usage, is evident of a risk of overlapping fire vs friendly units, in an arbitrary engagement of reaction fire, off-turn.
On some level the Tank/Rocket Launcher functions autonomously in it's unit in that it is 'over powered' vs it's (X-COM Soldiers)staff in a given direction and is in some unit-1 direction covering for the incomplete disadvantages of the entire (Mixed)Conventional group argument(1 Tank 10 Soldiers) 1-to-1 by effective singular use. (metagame)
