Difference between revisions of "File talk:SuperMen.zip"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (No one added the virus warning, it's boilerplate) |
(→Broken second version?: new section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: That's just a standard warning that is added to all binary files as a matter of course. Thanks for being careful though with your file - and thanks for providing it, much appreciated! [[User:Spike|Spike]] 12:51, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | : That's just a standard warning that is added to all binary files as a matter of course. Thanks for being careful though with your file - and thanks for providing it, much appreciated! [[User:Spike|Spike]] 12:51, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::kthx [[User:Zarn|Zarn]] 12:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Broken second version? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The second version seems to be broken. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:48, 5 September 2011
I can't see who added the virus warning, otherwise I would leave him/her a message. The file is completely safe. I have authored it myself (I may have the turbo pascal source somewhere) and this can be verified with an antivirus program. Those who are in the know can find the supermen.exe checksum in the exclusion list of NOD32 antivirus (see Supermen for reason). Zarn 06:08, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
- That's just a standard warning that is added to all binary files as a matter of course. Thanks for being careful though with your file - and thanks for providing it, much appreciated! Spike 12:51, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
- kthx Zarn 12:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
Broken second version?
The second version seems to be broken.