Difference between revisions of "Talk:Base Defence"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(yeah, "offing" is real English...)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
is it supposed to be "offering"  OR  "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author  [[User:EsTeR|EsTeR]]
 
is it supposed to be "offering"  OR  "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author  [[User:EsTeR|EsTeR]]
 +
 +
== yeah, "offing" is real English... ==
 +
 +
real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase "setting off on a journey" or "about to set off" and wound up just being, "in the offing". You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :)

Revision as of 04:50, 11 November 2005

Base Disjoint Bug

Reference for the base disjoint bug is at:

http://www.geocities.com/nkfarma/reference/bdb.html

If anyone wants to remodel or redraw it in a more suitable form or make it easier to understand, then please feel free to do so.

Other thoughts I might have is to give a rough indication of the layout of ground modules to allow players to plan ahead and perhaps even make use of the disjointed walls.

(Also note - hangar and small radar are the safest modules to place in lower right)

- NKF

80-item limit

This is listed in Known Bugs. [JFG]

um,

Quote (at article page): "An inbound Battleship on a "Retaliation" mission means there is a high chance that a Base Defense mission is in the offing for you.

is it supposed to be "offering" OR "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author EsTeR

yeah, "offing" is real English...

real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase "setting off on a journey" or "about to set off" and wound up just being, "in the offing". You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :)