Difference between revisions of "Talk:Base Defence"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Defense Question)
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
If your defenses hit the UFO but don't disable it, does it have any effect on the number of aliens in the landing party?
 
If your defenses hit the UFO but don't disable it, does it have any effect on the number of aliens in the landing party?
 +
 +
[i]None at all. - [[User:Bomb Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] 16:34, 9 September 2006 (PDT)[/i]

Revision as of 23:34, 9 September 2006

Base Disjoint Bug

Reference for the base disjoint bug is at:

http://www.geocities.com/nkfarma/reference/bdb.html

If anyone wants to remodel or redraw it in a more suitable form or make it easier to understand, then please feel free to do so.

Other thoughts I might have is to give a rough indication of the layout of ground modules to allow players to plan ahead and perhaps even make use of the disjointed walls.

(Also note - hangar and small radar are the safest modules to place in lower right)

- NKF

80-item limit

This is listed in Known Bugs. [JFG]

um,

Quote (at article page): "An inbound Battleship on a "Retaliation" mission means there is a high chance that a Base Defense mission is in the offing for you.

is it supposed to be "offering" OR "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author EsTeR

yeah, "offing" is real English...

real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase "setting off on a journey" or "about to set off" and wound up just being, "in the offing". You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :)


No Retreat!,No Surrender!

Always have rocket launching tanks at ready.Leaving a base without blowing up at least 10 Snakemen scum is a stain on our honor.

Kill the Alien,Purge the Alien,Burn the....Alien!And yes I'm a WH40k bitch--X-COM:Turcocalypse 13:02, 22 April 2006 (PDT)

Defense Question

If your defenses hit the UFO but don't disable it, does it have any effect on the number of aliens in the landing party?

[i]None at all. - Bomb Bloke 16:34, 9 September 2006 (PDT)[/i]