Difference between revisions of "Talk:Base Facilities (EU)"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Base Facilities (UFO Defense) moved to Talk:Base Facilities)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Building more containment in the same base does not increase the ten-type limit. Can anyone else check?
 
Building more containment in the same base does not increase the ten-type limit. Can anyone else check?
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Something else to check, I may look into it further at some point but I really want to finish the month I am playing at some point soon, is that maintenance is messed up, you pay vastly different maintenance on some of the facilities compared to what it says you should, and you dont even pay the same amount for second copies of the same type (and the third and so on seem to vary sometimes). To save me repeating it here, i started mentioning on [[Talk:UFO_Interception]] (which is getting somewhat offtopic...)
 +
 +
--[[User:Sfnhltb|Sfnhltb]] 17:09, 28 February 2007 (PST)

Revision as of 01:09, 1 March 2007

I am not certain about this, because it's been a while... I believe Alien Containment also falls in the group of structures that are useless beyond one per base. You can have as many live aliens as you like, as long as you don't have more than ten different types in each base. (Type: Each alien species+their job description.)

You can have more than 10+ live sectoid soldiers in one base, and it would only take up one space in the containment-area.But if you then capture (as examples) a gillman soldier, or sectoid engineer, either of these would take up an extra spot in the containment.

Building more containment in the same base does not increase the ten-type limit. Can anyone else check?


Something else to check, I may look into it further at some point but I really want to finish the month I am playing at some point soon, is that maintenance is messed up, you pay vastly different maintenance on some of the facilities compared to what it says you should, and you dont even pay the same amount for second copies of the same type (and the third and so on seem to vary sometimes). To save me repeating it here, i started mentioning on Talk:UFO_Interception (which is getting somewhat offtopic...)

--Sfnhltb 17:09, 28 February 2007 (PST)