Talk:Biochemistry

From UFOpaedia
Revision as of 23:21, 7 December 2009 by Talon81 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

it seems to me that the values under "cost" are WAY off. First off, I am making the assumption that by cost we mean "skill hours" and not financial cost. Some of them could be simply mistakes, such as the multiworm being listed as 90k and 15k, which is (according to Apoc'd) 9k and 15k; yet others are so different that it cannot have been a simple typo. Is there something I am missing? Talon81 23:30, 18 November 2009 (EST)

Looking at it the Hyperworm, Multiworm Egg and the Multiworm seem to have all typos. The original poster that added the skill hours was Blaimjos but he doesn't mentioned his source. Either he got it from one of the forums or from the Official Strategy Guide. Can you check with Apoc'd all of the values that don't match? Hobbes 05:57, 19 November 2009 (EST)
Yeah, I noticed those ones seem to be typos. I have only been around this wiki for at most a year, and only on Apoc wiki for a couple months. I didn't want to be presumptuous in making major edits, but I have fixed a few things here and there. Anyway, I am going to edit all of them to match Apoc'd now, and you can review my changes and undo anything you know to be wrong... but I am pretty certain Apoc'd is correct.Talon81 14:00, 19 November 2009 (EST)
Modesty is a virtue but don't let it restrain you from doing edits if the information is incorrect or outdated. No one here holds the truth... perhaps someone will come in a year and tell us that Apoc'd values are all wrong :) Hobbes 14:42, 19 November 2009 (EST)
BLASPHEMY!!! :-) J'ordos 07:02, 20 November 2009 (EST)
Thus speaks the god J'ordos... we will all feel his wrath and anger now! ;) Hobbes 11:32, 20 November 2009 (EST)
Sorry I'm not a regular contributor. My interest is usually tied to when I'm playing the game. My reference source was my now yellowing strategy guide. I've found some mistakes over 12+ years but didn't know about Apoc'd and figured more was better than less. I'll try to include my reference in the future. Thanks for seeing enough value to correct rather than revert!!Blaimjos 20:59, 6 December 2009 (EST)
No need to feel bad. There is so much conflicting information coming from different sources, and as it turns out just because its official doesnt make it correct. In any case, I wouldn't have corrected something that wasn't there to begin with, so your help is appreciated. ;-) Talon81 18:21, 7 December 2009 (EST)