Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boomeroid"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
::Will remove the opinion, as it serves no purpose outside the discussion page.
 
::Will remove the opinion, as it serves no purpose outside the discussion page.
 
::--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 02:10, 18 August 2008 (PDT)
 
::--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 02:10, 18 August 2008 (PDT)
  +
  +
:::Thanks for the advice.
  +
:::--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 05:31, 18 August 2008 (PDT)

Revision as of 13:31, 18 August 2008

I, personally, do not think that the boomeroid is a poor weapon; it softens up aliens around the corner, can sometimes find that last "hiding" alien and thrown between the closing doors of a UFO... well, that's just mean. Out-of-LOS fatal wounds are also possible. Of course, civilians attract boomeroids easily... --Karp 00:42, 18 August 2008 (PDT)


The last few paragraphs that mention that can be removed as they appear to be more opinion than factual (and is rather contrary to the rest of the explanation).
Except for the blast-on-impact bit (which I think I added). I use that a lot, on account of the boomeroids that often litter the battlefield - anything can be solved with enough explosives. The only thing that's really against them is their size and their inability to destroy the reinforcement spawn pads. - NKF 00:58, 18 August 2008 (PDT)
Or with a few inc. grenades. Fire also solves everything, albeit slower.
Will remove the opinion, as it serves no purpose outside the discussion page.
--Karp 02:10, 18 August 2008 (PDT)
Thanks for the advice.
--Karp 05:31, 18 August 2008 (PDT)