Difference between revisions of "Talk:Class Builds (EU2012)"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Do you plan to stick to left/right builds, and alternates in the notes, or would you like suggestions? Like my real initials are XCM (just 1 letter off from spelling "XCOM", heh)...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Do you plan to stick to left/right builds, and alternates in the notes, or would you like suggestions? Like my real initials are XCM (just 1 letter off from spelling "XCOM", heh), and I have my own build prefrences, if you've seen my additions to the individual Classes pages. --[[User:Xuncu|Xuncu]] 20:41, 18 April 2013 (EDT)
 
Do you plan to stick to left/right builds, and alternates in the notes, or would you like suggestions? Like my real initials are XCM (just 1 letter off from spelling "XCOM", heh), and I have my own build prefrences, if you've seen my additions to the individual Classes pages. --[[User:Xuncu|Xuncu]] 20:41, 18 April 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
It doesn't say it's protected, and it's a wiki. Feel free.
 +
 +
Tbh I'm not sure of the wisdom of having this page. From my experience with wowwiki everyone will put their favourite build on it, many of which will be 1 point different from an existing build or just plain bad (with informative descriptions like "this is 4 fun and is gr8"). From there you either let it grow in to an uninformative mess, or take out the trash and get accused of being wikihitler. But hey, I could be wrong. [[User:Binkyuk|Binkyuk]] 13:13, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:13, 19 April 2013

Do you plan to stick to left/right builds, and alternates in the notes, or would you like suggestions? Like my real initials are XCM (just 1 letter off from spelling "XCOM", heh), and I have my own build prefrences, if you've seen my additions to the individual Classes pages. --Xuncu 20:41, 18 April 2013 (EDT)

It doesn't say it's protected, and it's a wiki. Feel free.

Tbh I'm not sure of the wisdom of having this page. From my experience with wowwiki everyone will put their favourite build on it, many of which will be 1 point different from an existing build or just plain bad (with informative descriptions like "this is 4 fun and is gr8"). From there you either let it grow in to an uninformative mess, or take out the trash and get accused of being wikihitler. But hey, I could be wrong. Binkyuk 13:13, 19 April 2013 (EDT)