Difference between revisions of "Talk:Differences to X-COM (UFO2000)"
MikeTheRed (talk | contribs) (Question re: UFO2k) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
---[[User:MikeTheRed|MikeTheRed]] 07:08, 9 June 2006 (PDT) | ---[[User:MikeTheRed|MikeTheRed]] 07:08, 9 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes Mike, UFO2000 is only the tactical part of X-COM for now. Thanks for the tip regarding bullets. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cool, thanks. That would be something to state in the "Differences" page. You can delete this Discussion after reading. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---[[User:MikeTheRed|MikeTheRed]] 07:50, 9 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | UFO2000 is not X-COM at all. It is definitely Laser Squad clone. :P --[[User:Wasd|Wasd]] 10:00, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Which Laser Squad, the original Laser Squad, or Laser Squad Nemesis? [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 11:02, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:02, 20 July 2009
Hobbes (or anyone),
I don't see any mention of Geoscape/Bases and there's the statement "You don't have to worry about losing your troops like you did on X-COM". Is UFO2k only the tactical part of X-COM?
Tiny wiki note: On this page you are using hyphens as bullets. If you use asterisks instead, you'll get a "proper bullet" and the paragraphs will be indented. Or use # to cause automatic numbering.
---MikeTheRed 07:08, 9 June 2006 (PDT)
Yes Mike, UFO2000 is only the tactical part of X-COM for now. Thanks for the tip regarding bullets.
Cool, thanks. That would be something to state in the "Differences" page. You can delete this Discussion after reading.
---MikeTheRed 07:50, 9 June 2006 (PDT)
UFO2000 is not X-COM at all. It is definitely Laser Squad clone. :P --Wasd 10:00, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
- Which Laser Squad, the original Laser Squad, or Laser Squad Nemesis? Hobbes 11:02, 20 July 2009 (EDT)