Difference between revisions of "Talk:Long War Table"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Opened discussion about Transports getting their own entry.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Transport entry== | ==Transport entry== | ||
Is the Transport entry really necessary? There's really not a reason to be transparent with the 90s version, as the 90s version actually allowed you to build transports, had different tiers, had possibility of them getting attacked, etc... In XCOM:EU/EW/LW, it's just one ship that can't be damaged, destroyed or rebuilt, and taxes a constant 20 credits per month. It doesn't seem to me like that warrants it's own page. [[User:Thels|Thels]] ([[User talk:Thels|talk]]) 04:45, 2 July 2015 (EDT) | Is the Transport entry really necessary? There's really not a reason to be transparent with the 90s version, as the 90s version actually allowed you to build transports, had different tiers, had possibility of them getting attacked, etc... In XCOM:EU/EW/LW, it's just one ship that can't be damaged, destroyed or rebuilt, and taxes a constant 20 credits per month. It doesn't seem to me like that warrants it's own page. [[User:Thels|Thels]] ([[User talk:Thels|talk]]) 04:45, 2 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::There is no separate page for Transport. Skyranger is just mentioned on the Hangar page, which I think is fine. As for the entry on the main page, IMO both Interceptors and Transport should be deleted as they just link within a page, which is generally wrong for main page entries (no other entry links within a page). [[User:Riw|Riw]] ([[User talk:Riw|talk]]) 08:44, 2 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:44, 2 July 2015
Transport entry
Is the Transport entry really necessary? There's really not a reason to be transparent with the 90s version, as the 90s version actually allowed you to build transports, had different tiers, had possibility of them getting attacked, etc... In XCOM:EU/EW/LW, it's just one ship that can't be damaged, destroyed or rebuilt, and taxes a constant 20 credits per month. It doesn't seem to me like that warrants it's own page. Thels (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2015 (EDT)
- There is no separate page for Transport. Skyranger is just mentioned on the Hangar page, which I think is fine. As for the entry on the main page, IMO both Interceptors and Transport should be deleted as they just link within a page, which is generally wrong for main page entries (no other entry links within a page). Riw (talk) 08:44, 2 July 2015 (EDT)