Difference between revisions of "Talk:Manufacturing Profitability"
MikeTheRed (talk | contribs) (Note for Dumas) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Let me know if I'm missing something - [[User:MikeTheRed|MikeTheRed]] 18:41, 9 November 2006 (PST) | Let me know if I'm missing something - [[User:MikeTheRed|MikeTheRed]] 18:41, 9 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I see. So that's what the AA thing means. It's not explained very clearly. I'll fix that.--[[User:Dumas|Dumas]] 04:58, 10 November 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 12:58, 10 November 2006
Dumas, re: your point about Alien Alloys being plentiful - That section about LCs versus FBLs addresses a common early misperception. In actuality, both LCs and FBLs make the same amount of profit each ($18k), but you can make ~33% more LCs per month with a given number of engineers. In other words, LCs are 33% more profitable than FBLs, period.
Unless you want to make your FBLs one at a time, so that they don't need AAs. Then, they're just barely (2%) more profitable than LCs. (If you play with the spreadsheet, this is clear.)
So it doesn't really have anything to do with AAs. LCs are a far better deal than FBLs, unless you want to hassle with making FBLs one at a time. Either way, you never needed a single AA. (And if you've got a big surplus of AAs, then just sell'em! smile)
Let me know if I'm missing something - MikeTheRed 18:41, 9 November 2006 (PST)
I see. So that's what the AA thing means. It's not explained very clearly. I'll fix that.--Dumas 04:58, 10 November 2006 (PST)