Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wolfhound APC (Apocalypse)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Captain Foo (talk | contribs) (New page: Have some people had success with storing their extra troops inside an APC to protect them in case the roof collapses on them? That's about the only use I can think of for the APC unless ...) |
(Reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Have some people had success with storing their extra troops inside an APC to protect them in case the roof collapses on them? That's about the only use I can think of for the APC unless someone else has clever ideas for it. | Have some people had success with storing their extra troops inside an APC to protect them in case the roof collapses on them? That's about the only use I can think of for the APC unless someone else has clever ideas for it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But doesn't the vehicle get destroyed if the building collapses, o' Nameless one, or do I remember incorrectly? And don't agents still count as being inside a building if they are in a vehicle inside the building, although it wouldn't matter if the collapse kills the vehicle... | ||
+ | :-[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 21:57, 1 September 2008 (PDT) |
Revision as of 04:57, 2 September 2008
Have some people had success with storing their extra troops inside an APC to protect them in case the roof collapses on them? That's about the only use I can think of for the APC unless someone else has clever ideas for it.
But doesn't the vehicle get destroyed if the building collapses, o' Nameless one, or do I remember incorrectly? And don't agents still count as being inside a building if they are in a vehicle inside the building, although it wouldn't matter if the collapse kills the vehicle...
- -Karp 21:57, 1 September 2008 (PDT)