Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aquatoid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amitakartok (talk | contribs) (New page: Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--~~~...) |
Debesh Unnos (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--[[User:Amitakartok|Amitakartok]] 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST) | Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--[[User:Amitakartok|Amitakartok]] 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Direct quote from the Sectoid autopsy here. | ||
| + | :"The webbing between the fingers and the flat feet suggest aquatic origins." | ||
| + | :Seems like Aquatoids are most definitely the original species. | ||
| + | :[[User:Debesh Unnos|Debesh Unnos]] 20:54, 12 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:54, 13 February 2013
Some debate whether Sectoids or Aquatoids came first. I think that since T'leth is millions of years old, the Aquatoid was the original and the Sectoid was an evolutionary descendant.--Amitakartok 16:58, 8 November 2008 (CST)
- Direct quote from the Sectoid autopsy here.
- "The webbing between the fingers and the flat feet suggest aquatic origins."
- Seems like Aquatoids are most definitely the original species.
- Debesh Unnos 20:54, 12 February 2013 (EST)