Difference between revisions of "Talk:Base Defence"
MikeTheRed (talk | contribs) (yeah, "offing" is real English...) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
is it supposed to be "offering" OR "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author [[User:EsTeR|EsTeR]] | is it supposed to be "offering" OR "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author [[User:EsTeR|EsTeR]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == yeah, "offing" is real English... == | ||
+ | |||
+ | real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase "setting off on a journey" or "about to set off" and wound up just being, "in the offing". You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :) |
Revision as of 04:50, 11 November 2005
Base Disjoint Bug
Reference for the base disjoint bug is at:
http://www.geocities.com/nkfarma/reference/bdb.html
If anyone wants to remodel or redraw it in a more suitable form or make it easier to understand, then please feel free to do so.
Other thoughts I might have is to give a rough indication of the layout of ground modules to allow players to plan ahead and perhaps even make use of the disjointed walls.
(Also note - hangar and small radar are the safest modules to place in lower right)
- NKF
80-item limit
This is listed in Known Bugs. [JFG]
um,
Quote (at article page): "An inbound Battleship on a "Retaliation" mission means there is a high chance that a Base Defense mission is in the offing for you.
is it supposed to be "offering" OR "offing" such as "knocking you off, hitman-style" Coulkd be a typo by author EsTeR
yeah, "offing" is real English...
real informal English, but common, just the same. It derives from the phrase "setting off on a journey" or "about to set off" and wound up just being, "in the offing". You can delete both these comments after reading. Good to talk with ya again :)