Difference between revisions of "Talk:Displacer /Sonic"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Version Check!: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
== Version Check! ==
 
== Version Check! ==
  
Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)
+
Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 damage matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Also, something which has been bothering me for a while, the ammo is 100, not 99. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:29, 10 August 2012

Most recent edit

Superior to Magnetic Ion Armour? The front plate is definitively weaker, and it lacks the MIA's 10% resistance to Sonic weaponry making the back pretty close to even. It's a little iffy. Magic9mushroom 06:45, 6 March 2012 (EST)

Depends on how you look at it. The Magnetic Ion Armor does do better from the front, but as a whole the displacer does have 130 all-round armour, which does offer better overall protection from areas that Magnetic Ion Armour is most vulnerable. -NKF 12:19, 6 March 2012 (EST)

Version Check!

Since it seems there's different opinions on what the turret stats are, I think we need a version check to compare the stats. I know the previous edit of 130 damage matches with my fresh install of TFTD for Dos + the v2 update. Also, something which has been bothering me for a while, the ammo is 100, not 99. Anyone with unedited copies of the CE and PSX versions able to verify their values? -NKF 03:21, 10 August 2012 (EDT)