Difference between revisions of "Talk:Research Popular Sequences and Tips"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(The Optimum Three) |
m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Another great addition, NKF. By the way, I suggest christening your second group of 3 aliens the "Optimum Three", as in, if you're only going to capture 3 aliens, these are the best three to capture. [[User:Spike|Spike]] 16:06, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | Another great addition, NKF. By the way, I suggest christening your second group of 3 aliens the "Optimum Three", as in, if you're only going to capture 3 aliens, these are the best three to capture. [[User:Spike|Spike]] 16:06, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Not really an addition, more moving stuff out from the Research Basics page which is really mish-mash of random stuff that would better fit elsewhere. However, I seem to have lost the improvements I did to the text when I shifted it over. I had split it into two sections! Oh well, easily fixed! I'll go with Optimum, as that would describe it best. [[User:NKF|NKF]] 01:52, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Ah actually I meant to still call the first, generic group of 3 the Minimum Three, but to call the second, more specific and more useful group of 3 the Optimum Three. Sorry I was not more clear! [[User:Spike|Spike]] 12:16, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I guess the first set isn't quite the optimal setup. So's the equipment. Well, let's go with that then. [[User:NKF|NKF]] 01:25, 12 September 2012 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 05:25, 12 September 2012
The Optimum Three
Another great addition, NKF. By the way, I suggest christening your second group of 3 aliens the "Optimum Three", as in, if you're only going to capture 3 aliens, these are the best three to capture. Spike 16:06, 10 September 2012 (EDT)
- Not really an addition, more moving stuff out from the Research Basics page which is really mish-mash of random stuff that would better fit elsewhere. However, I seem to have lost the improvements I did to the text when I shifted it over. I had split it into two sections! Oh well, easily fixed! I'll go with Optimum, as that would describe it best. NKF 01:52, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- Ah actually I meant to still call the first, generic group of 3 the Minimum Three, but to call the second, more specific and more useful group of 3 the Optimum Three. Sorry I was not more clear! Spike 12:16, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- I guess the first set isn't quite the optimal setup. So's the equipment. Well, let's go with that then. NKF 01:25, 12 September 2012 (EDT)