Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stasis Bomb Launcher (Apocalypse)"

From UFOpaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply)
(Reply)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Stasis, with one s, is the correct spelling, I believe. It should be the same in-game, but cannot remember for the death of me.
 
Stasis, with one s, is the correct spelling, I believe. It should be the same in-game, but cannot remember for the death of me.
 
:--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 03:08, 25 August 2008 (PDT)
 
:--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 03:08, 25 August 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
Also, shouldn't we say that the weapon systems reboot almost instantaniously? The hull is caught in the field, and so should the weapons, but they can still be fired... and without anti-grav engine running, shouldn't the ship fall to it's demise? So this is clearly not just a reboot field or something... confusing.
 +
:--[[User:Karpatius|Karp]] 03:46, 25 August 2008 (PDT)

Revision as of 10:46, 25 August 2008

I don't have the game installed on my current (functional) PC, but could we check the in-game spelling for this missile? I get this feeling that it's spelled stassis (four s'seseses). It clearly generates a stasis field and all, but it's best to get this cleared early on. -NKF 01:55, 25 August 2008 (PDT)

Stasis, with one s, is the correct spelling, I believe. It should be the same in-game, but cannot remember for the death of me.

--Karp 03:08, 25 August 2008 (PDT)

Also, shouldn't we say that the weapon systems reboot almost instantaniously? The hull is caught in the field, and so should the weapons, but they can still be fired... and without anti-grav engine running, shouldn't the ship fall to it's demise? So this is clearly not just a reboot field or something... confusing.

--Karp 03:46, 25 August 2008 (PDT)