Difference between revisions of "Talk:X-COM Disruptor Armor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Bomb Bloke (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, the protection values here do NOT look correct. | Hey, the protection values here do NOT look correct. | ||
| − | In fact, they are exactly the same as the Megapol Armor. | + | In fact, they are exactly the same as the Megapol Armor. - [[User:Jasonred|Jasonred]] |
:Can't recall where I got those values and I don't have Apoc installed on this computer. Most likely I got the values from a game editor made by j'ordos available on the www.xcomufo.com forums. [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 19:47, 9 June 2011 (EDT) | :Can't recall where I got those values and I don't have Apoc installed on this computer. Most likely I got the values from a game editor made by j'ordos available on the www.xcomufo.com forums. [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 19:47, 9 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
: I'm no help here (can't get Apoc to run on my Laptop with or without dosbox) but they definitely don't look right as I thought they were in the 35 - 75 range? -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 01:08, 10 June 2011 (EDT) | : I'm no help here (can't get Apoc to run on my Laptop with or without dosbox) but they definitely don't look right as I thought they were in the 35 - 75 range? -[[User:NKF|NKF]] 01:08, 10 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: All fixed now. The other values all check out as correct. - <span style="font-size:xx-small"> [[User:Bomb_Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] ([[User_talk:Bomb_Bloke|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Bomb_Bloke|Contribs]])</span> 03:17, 10 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:17, 10 June 2011
Hey, the protection values here do NOT look correct.
In fact, they are exactly the same as the Megapol Armor. - Jasonred
- Can't recall where I got those values and I don't have Apoc installed on this computer. Most likely I got the values from a game editor made by j'ordos available on the www.xcomufo.com forums. Hobbes 19:47, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
- I'm no help here (can't get Apoc to run on my Laptop with or without dosbox) but they definitely don't look right as I thought they were in the 35 - 75 range? -NKF 01:08, 10 June 2011 (EDT)
- All fixed now. The other values all check out as correct. - Bomb Bloke (Talk/Contribs) 03:17, 10 June 2011 (EDT)