Difference between revisions of "User talk:Hobbes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bomb Bloke (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I cleaned up your unit types page. You had a few strange sentences and words. I think that later I will also add the armor statistics to each section, if you think it is appropriate. | I cleaned up your unit types page. You had a few strange sentences and words. I think that later I will also add the armor statistics to each section, if you think it is appropriate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - [[User:Robotrek|Robotrek]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
Sounds good. Thanks | Sounds good. Thanks | ||
| − | [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 15:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT) | + | - [[User:Hobbes|Hobbes]] 15:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT) |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hiya Hobbes. Any chance you could spill some info on the format of the .RMP files used in the [[ROUTES|routes folder]]? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[ROUTES.DAT]] uses much the same format, but always has 70 records. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - [[User:Bomb Bloke|Bomb Bloke]] | ||
Revision as of 12:24, 20 June 2006
I cleaned up your unit types page. You had a few strange sentences and words. I think that later I will also add the armor statistics to each section, if you think it is appropriate.
- Robotrek
Sounds good. Thanks
- Hobbes 15:37, 13 June 2006 (PDT)
Hiya Hobbes. Any chance you could spill some info on the format of the .RMP files used in the routes folder?
ROUTES.DAT uses much the same format, but always has 70 records.